Have been on another make's forum. The above came up. This the first of several posts
No. 1 "Speaking of timing issues... The 3.6 in that Traverse is the worst engine GM has made in years. Have one sitting abandoned at the shop because the owner couldn't afford the work. Funny thing is, since we never started he doesn't yet owe anything and he's free to pick it up (less a storage fee) but it's just not worth it. You'll be lucky if it gets much past half of your old van's miles".
No 2 "If you go back to 2009 the number of issues doubles. 2008 was the only year that engine was nearly trouble free. That's the only year it was port injected. Every year since it's been direct injection. 2009 and 2010 had a lot of issues with pistons burning holes through them. 2011 they fixed those issues and the engines were finally able to get enough miles on them to show how junk the timing system is. Somewhere around 2014 they finally relocated the front engine mount closer to the transmission instead of directly below the oil filter where it suffered a premature death. This relocation weakened the torsional strength of the mounting setup which beats up the front suspension and mounts.
Each redesign has left a flaw in its wake. The GM of today is nothing like the GM of the carb era. Back in the days of carbs, Chevy was king. Now they're a benchmark of the bare minimum for what it takes to get a car to market. Only way they will get any better is if everyone stops buying their junk. Currently that means, if you buy GM, get an LS. The LS may not be flawless, but it's at least made to a better standard of quality.
Full disclosure: I just got home from working in a hot shop all day... Guess what brand had more cars roll up today?
Malibu and Equinox needing timing, Canyon needing wiring repairs, Silverado needed the door reattached... Aside from the General Malfunctions there was a Hyundai Genesis that needed an oil change. Guess which job I'd rather do?"
No. 1 "Speaking of timing issues... The 3.6 in that Traverse is the worst engine GM has made in years. Have one sitting abandoned at the shop because the owner couldn't afford the work. Funny thing is, since we never started he doesn't yet owe anything and he's free to pick it up (less a storage fee) but it's just not worth it. You'll be lucky if it gets much past half of your old van's miles".
No 2 "If you go back to 2009 the number of issues doubles. 2008 was the only year that engine was nearly trouble free. That's the only year it was port injected. Every year since it's been direct injection. 2009 and 2010 had a lot of issues with pistons burning holes through them. 2011 they fixed those issues and the engines were finally able to get enough miles on them to show how junk the timing system is. Somewhere around 2014 they finally relocated the front engine mount closer to the transmission instead of directly below the oil filter where it suffered a premature death. This relocation weakened the torsional strength of the mounting setup which beats up the front suspension and mounts.
Each redesign has left a flaw in its wake. The GM of today is nothing like the GM of the carb era. Back in the days of carbs, Chevy was king. Now they're a benchmark of the bare minimum for what it takes to get a car to market. Only way they will get any better is if everyone stops buying their junk. Currently that means, if you buy GM, get an LS. The LS may not be flawless, but it's at least made to a better standard of quality.
Full disclosure: I just got home from working in a hot shop all day... Guess what brand had more cars roll up today?