What I wonder is why aren't Traverses perfect. I mean it. I understand assembly errors, but I can't reconcile myself to the list of errors that can be attributed to design shortcomings and flaws. As long as humans have been making cars -- and most of that time with a fraction of the computerized design and engineering assists -- you'd think the basic systems would function flawlessly. And, GM breathed life into the Traverse two full years after it's oldest siblings. Don't get me wrong, Traverse is a great car by any measure, but why can't it be a perfect car?
Listed below is a short list of issues I think should never have been issues if the designers and engineers had done their jobs just the smallest bit better:
- Steering noises, clunks, squeaks, rattles, and defective racks
- Seat belt recall
- Numerous engine codes
- Door trim pieces that peel on LTZs
- Transmissions that must be coaxed into downshifting smoothly and have had multiple software flashes
- Front seat head restraints that are uncomfortable for the shoulders of many drivers
Why can't a vehicle we all love be free of these nuisances?
Listed below is a short list of issues I think should never have been issues if the designers and engineers had done their jobs just the smallest bit better:
- Steering noises, clunks, squeaks, rattles, and defective racks
- Seat belt recall
- Numerous engine codes
- Door trim pieces that peel on LTZs
- Transmissions that must be coaxed into downshifting smoothly and have had multiple software flashes
- Front seat head restraints that are uncomfortable for the shoulders of many drivers
Why can't a vehicle we all love be free of these nuisances?