Joined
·
994 Posts
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/22/automobiles/autoreviews/22traverse.html
A very good review of "our" Traverse..."better" than its cousins?
A very good review of "our" Traverse..."better" than its cousins?
And DD what you say is right ie early A, C, E are lacking. The article gives the impression that Traverse are superior to current A, C and E when of course all 2009 Lambdas would benefit from what was learned from the earlier editions.DuayneD said:And I really liked this section: "While the three others are solid, impressive vehicles, G.M.’s engineers seem to have learned a lot since those models came to market.
Boo-yahh! Sorry, early Acadia, Outlook and Enclave buyers!
Oooooh, good point, there, CopperBeech. One would assume any refinements were made also be applied to all the 2009 Lamda sibs.copperbeech said:And .... The article gives the impression that Traverse are superior to current A, C and E when of course all 2009 Lambdas would benefit from what was learned from the earlier editions.